Desert Management

Desert Management

Correction of TRMM 3B43 Monthly Precipitation Data Using Quantile Regression Model in the Urmia Lake Basin

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Sima Kazempour Choursi 1
Mahdi Erfanian 2
Hirad Abghari 2
Mirhassan Miryaghoobzadeh 2
Khadijeh Javan 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
10.22034/jdmal.2024.2021488.1452
Abstract
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
Improving the precision of rainfall data is essential for hydrological modeling, water resources management, and drought monitoring. The spatial variations of precipitation are often not captured by traditional rain gauge data. Remote sensing, such as the TRMM 3B43, can provide a more accurate spatial distribution of rainfall, particularly in regions that lack rain gauge stations. The TRMM 3B43 algorithm is aimed at providing the most precise rainfall estimates by utilizing a combination of multi-sensor measurements gathered from different satellites. The objective of this study is to use quantile regression models to adjust TRMM 3B43 precipitation in the Urmia Lake basin for the period 2001-2019. This study is centered around the Urmia Lake basin, which is known for its ecological significance and vulnerability to climate variability. By analyzing TRMM 3B43 data in this region, our goal is to provide valuable insights that can be used to enhance water resource planning and management. The purpose of this research is not just to address the shortcomings of traditional rain gauge stations, but also to highlight the importance of tailored approaches for regions with unique hydro-climatic conditions.
 
Material and Methods
The monthly precipitation data from TRMM 3B43 was calibrated through the use of quantile regression models and Ordinary Least Squares regression with the assistance of 12 synoptic station data from the Urmia Lake basin. The calibration process utilized 70% of the data from 2001 to 2019, with the remaining 30% reserved for validation. Quantile regression was applied across various quantiles (τ = 0.05 to τ = 0.99) to capture a comprehensive range of conditions. To assess accuracy, established metrics like RMSE, MAE, PBIAS, and KGE were applied to evaluate the regression equations' ability to correct TRMM monthly precipitation data.
 
Results and Discussion
The scatter plots comparing monthly observations and TRMM precipitation data showed a consistent overestimation by the TRMM satellite across all months. The studies conducted confirmed this overestimation pattern across different time scales. Linear Regression was not enough to correct the TRMM data, as the corrected data still showed both underestimation and overestimation. However, using quantile regression in different quantiles successfully corrected TRMM 3B43 data. The results indicated that the TRMM satellite data was almost identical to the observed data in every month. The RMSE reached its highest value in January, December, February, March, April, November, and May, with values of 22.64, 20.76, 20.04, 17.99, 17.35, 15.07, and 13.67, respectively. After correction using quantile regression, the RMSE values decreased to less than 2.35 in all months. Furthermore, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) significantly decreased after quantile regression correction, demonstrating a closer alignment between TRMM data and observed rainfall. According to PBIAS, TRMM overestimated the rainfall in all months from January to December by different percentages. However, after quantile regression correction, the PBIAS values were generally below 2.10 in all the studied months. In all months, the Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) values showed a rise when the quantile regression method was used instead of the original TRMM data and the linear regression method. The corrected TRMM data using the quantile regression model has a superior performance, as indicated by KGE values above 0.97. The calibration process involved correcting 30% of randomly selected data with quantile regression equations obtained from the remaining 70% of the data. The process led to almost all points aligning closely with the ideal line of 1:1 after using quantile regression. The comparison of monthly rainfall data across all studied stations revealed a similar pattern between TRMM precipitation data and observed rainfall, with TRMM frequently assigning higher values than the actual observed rainfall. It is noteworthy that the TRMM satellite data at stations such as Sarab, Salmas, and Sahand initially differed significantly from the observed data. After calibrating with quantile regression, the satellite rainfall data closely matched the observed data. The quantile regression method is proven to be effective in correcting TRMM data, making it suitable for various studies, including water resources management and drought monitoring.
 
Conclusion
To conclude, the use of quantile regression was successful in correcting TRMM 3B43 precipitation data, addressing the persistent overestimation issues seen in the Urmia Lake basin between 2001 and 2019. The method's accuracy was significantly improved, as evidenced by decreased RMSE and MAE values, improved PBIAS alignment, and superior KGE performance. These findings confirm that quantile regression-corrected TRMM data is a reliable tool for diverse studies, particularly in water resources management and drought monitoring applications. These compelling findings not only demonstrate the success of the quantile regression approach but also emphasize its potential to refine precipitation data in other hydro-climatically sensitive regions. The corrected TRMM data, which has been validated by rigorous metrics, is a reliable and valuable resource for different applications, especially in the areas of water resources management and drought monitoring. This study contributes to the development of precipitation correction methodologies and underscores the importance of personalized approaches to enhance the precision of remote sensing-derived data in hydrological studies.
Keywords
Tropical Rainfall
Calibration Techniques
Satellite Data

Subjects

  1. Abbas, S. A., Xuan, Y., & Song, X. (2019). Quantile regression based methods for investigating rainfall trends associated with flooding and drought conditions. Water Resources Management, 33(12), 4249-4264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02362-0 
  2. Abdelmoneim, H., Soliman, M. R., & Moghazy, H. M. (2020). Evaluation of TRMM 3B42V7 and CHIRPS satellite precipitation products as an input for hydrological model over Eastern Nile Basin. Earth Systems and Environment, 4, 685-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-020-00185-3
  3. Ahn, K. H., & Palmer, R. (2016). Regional flood frequency analysis using spatial proximity and basin characteristics: Quantile regression vs. parameter regression technique. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 515-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.047 
  4. Almazroui, M. (2011). Calibration of TRMM rainfall climatology over Saudi Arabia during 1998–2009. Atmospheric Research, 99(3-4), 400-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.11.006
  5. Bararkhanpour, S., Ghorbani, K., Salari Jazi, M., & Rezaei Ghaleh, L. (2020). Study of seasonal and annual rainfall changes with quantile regression method (case study: Gorgan Hashem-Abad station. Journal of Climate Research, 10(39), 89-104. [In Persian]
  6. Beck, H. E., Van Dijk, A. I., Levizzani, V., Schellekens, J., Miralles, D. G., Martens, B., & De Roo, A. (2017). MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25 global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(1), 589-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess21-589-2017 
  7. Brasil Neto, R. M., Guimaraes Santos, C. A., Marques da Silva, R., & Costa dos Santos, C. A. (2022). Evaluation of TRMM satellite dataset for monitoring meteorological drought in northeastern Brazil. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 67(14), 2100-2120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2130333
  8. Choubin, B., Khalighi-Sigaroodi, S., Mishra, A., Goodarzi, M., Shamshirband, S., Ghaljaee, E., & Zhang, F. (2019). A novel bias correction framework of TMPA 3B42 daily precipitation data using similarity matrix/homogeneous conditions. Science of The Total Environment, 694, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/­j.scitotenv.2019.133680 
  9. de Almeida, K. N., dos Reis, J. A. T., Buarque, D. C., Mendonça, A. S. F., Rodrigues, M. B., & de Laia Nascimento Sá, G. (2020). Performance analysis of TRMM satellite in precipitation estimation for the Itapemirim River basin, Espirito Santo state, Brazil. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 141, 791-802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03204-5 
  10. Erfanian M., Kazempour S., & Heidari H. (2016). Calibration of TRMM satellite 3B42 and 3B43 rainfall data in climatic zones of Iran. Physical Geography Research. 48(2): 287-303. DOI: 22059/JPHGR.­2016.59370 [In Persian]
  11. Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., L., & Michaelsen, J. (2015). The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific data, 2(1), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038.sdata.2015.66
  12. Ghiglieri, G., Barbieri, G., Vernier, A., Carletti, A., & Pittalis, D. (2010). Sustainable water resources management to combat desertification in the Nurra region, northwestern Sardinia, Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 5(3), 7-14.
  13. Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., & Martinez, G. F. (2009). Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of hydrology, 377(1-2): 80-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
  14. Hou, A. Y., Kakar, R. K., Neeck, S., Azarbarzin, A. A., Kummerow, C. D., Kojima, M., Oki, R., Nakamura, K., & Iguchi, T. (2014). The global precipitation measurement mission. Bulletin of the American meteorological Society, 95(5), 701-722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1 
  15. Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Arkin, P., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Gruber, A., Janowiak, j., McNab, A., Rudolf, B., & Schneider, U. (1997). The global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(1), 5-20. DOI: https://­doi.org/­10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0005:TGPCPG>2.0.CO;2 
  16. Hsu, K. L., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, H. V. (1997). Precipitation estimation from remotely sensed information using artificial neural networks. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 36(9), 1176-1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1176:PEFRSI>2.0.CO;2 
  17. Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F., Gu, G., Hong, y., Bowman, k.p., & Stocker, E. F. (2007). The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. Journal of hydrometeorology, 8(1), 38-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1 
  18. Kazempour Choursi, S., Erfanian, M., & Ebadi Nehari, Z. (2019). Evaluation of MODIS and TRMM satellite data for drought monitoring in the Urmia Lake basin. Geography and Environmental Planning. 30(2): 17-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2019.115381.1115  [In Persian]
  19. Kubota, T., Shige, S., Hashizume, H., Aonashi, K., Takahashi, N., Seto, S., Hirose, M., Takayabu, Y.N., Ushio, T., Nakagawa, K., & Okamoto, K. I. (2007). Global precipitation map using satellite-borne microwave radiometers by the GSMaP project: Production and validation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(7), 2259-2275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.895337
  20. Li, F., Wei, W., Zhao, Y., & Qiao, J. (2017). Groundwater depth prediction in a shallow aquifer in north China by a quantile regression model. Hydrogeology Journal, 25(1), 191-202. DOI: https://doi.org/­10.1007/s10040-016-1473-0 
  21. Li, Y., Guo, B., Wang, K., Wu, G., & Shi, C. (2020). Performance of TRMM product in quantifying frequency and intensity of precipitation during daytime and nighttime across China. Remote Sensing, 12(4), 740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040740
  22. Liu, S., Yan, D., Qin, T., Weng, B., & Li, M. (2016). Correction of TRMM 3B42V7 based on linear regression models over China. Advances in Meteorology, 2016(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3103749
  23. Lu, X., Wei, M., Tang, G., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Evaluation and correction of the TRMM 3B43V7 and GPM 3IMERGM satellite precipitation products by use of ground-based data over Xinjiang, China. Environmental earth sciences, 77(209), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7378-6 
  24. Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50. DOI: https://doi.­org/10.2307/1913643
  25. Kolios, S., & Kalimeris, A. (2020). Evaluation of the TRMM rainfall product accuracy over the central Mediterranean during a 20-year period (1998–2017). Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 139(1-2), 785-799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03015-3 
  26. Kummerow, C., Barnes, W., Kozu, T., Shiue, J., & Simpson, J. (1998). The tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) sensor package. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15(3), 809-817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0809:TTRMMT>2.0.CO;2 
  27. Kyriakidis, P. C., Kim, J., & Miller, N. L. (2001). Geostatistical mapping of precipitation from rain gauge data using atmospheric and terrain characteristics. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 40(11), 1855-1877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1855:GMOPFR>2.0.CO;2 
  28. Mahesh, C., Prakash, S., Sathiyamoorthy, V., & Gairola, R. M. (2011). Artificial neural network based microwave precipitation estimation using scattering index and polarization corrected temperature. Atmospheric research, 102(3), 358-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.09.003  
  29. Petty, G. W. (1995). The status of satellite-based rainfall estimation over land. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1), 125-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)00070-4
  30. Ouatiki, H., Boudhar, A., & Chehbouni, A. (2023). Accuracy assessment and bias correction of remote sensing–based rainfall products over semiarid watersheds. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 154(3), 763-780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04586-y 
  31. Safavi Gherdini, M., Delbari, M., Amiri, M., & piri, J. (2019). Calibration of TRMM 3B43 precipitation data in Hormozgan. Irrigation and Water Engineering. 9(3): 99-112. DOI: https://doi.org/­10.22125/IWE.2019.88673 [In Persian]
  32. Scheel, M. L. M., Rohrer, M., Huggel, C., Santos Villar, D., Silvestre, E., & Huffman, G. J. (2011). Evaluation of TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) performance in the Central Andes region and its dependency on spatial and temporal resolution. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(8), 2649-2663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2649-2011
  33. Shahbazdashti, R., Sharafati, A., Kheyruri, Y., Ghasemzadeh, F., & Mohajeri, S. H. (2024). Enhancing the TRMM precipitation product in diverse regions of Iran through an intelligent-based post-processing approach. Acta Geophysica, 72, 2925-2940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01280-5 
  34. Shao, J. (1993). Linear model selection by cross-validation. Journal of the American statistical Association, 88(422), 486-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476299
  35. Shukla, A. K., Ojha, C. S. P., Singh, R. P., Pal, L., & Fu, D. (2019). Evaluation of TRMM precipitation dataset over Himalayan catchment: the upper Ganga basin, India. Water, 11(3), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030613
  36. Strauch, M., Kumar, R., Eisner, S., Mulligan, M., Reinhardt, J., Santini, W., Vetter, T., & Friesen, J. (2017). Adjustment of global precipitation data for enhanced hydrologic modeling of tropical Andean watersheds. Climatic Change, 141, 547-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1706-1 
  37. Tian, Y., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Choudhury, B. J., & Garcia, M. (2007). Multitemporal analysis of TRMM-based satellite precipitation products for land data assimilation applications. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8(6), 1165-1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM859.1 
  38. Treppiedi, D., Cipolla, G., Francipane, A., & Noto, L. V. (2021). Detecting precipitation trend using a multiscale approach based on quantile regression over a Mediterranean area. International Journal of Climatology, 41(13), 5938-5955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7161 
  39. Vallejo‐Bernal, S. M., Urrea, V., Bedoya‐Soto, J. M., Posada, D., Olarte, A., Cárdenas‐Posso, Y., Ruiz‐Murcia, F., Martínez, M. T., Petersen, W. A., Huffman, G. H., & Poveda, G. (2021). Ground validation of TRMM 3B43 V7 precipitation estimates over Colombia. Part I: Monthly and seasonal timescales. International Journal of Climatology, 41(1), 601-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/­joc.6640
  40. Zhang, T., Yang, Y., Dong, Z., & Gui, S. (2021). A multiscale assessment of three satellite precipitation products (TRMM, CMORPH, and PERSIANN) in the three gorges reservoir area in China. Advances in Meteorology, 2021, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979216 
Desert Management
Volume 12, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29
6 Article
Spring 2024
Pages 57-74

  • Receive Date 28 January 2024
  • Revise Date 10 March 2024
  • Accept Date 16 March 2024