Desert Management

Desert Management

Investigating the preliminary adaptation of plants to different levels of salinity (Case study: Dust hotspot No 4, Khuzestan)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Asisstant Professor, Department of Nature Engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
2 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
3 Department of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Khuzestan Province
4 Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
5 Associate Professor, Department of Nature Engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
6 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
7 Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
8 Associate Professor, Department of Range and Watershed Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
9 Agriculture and Natural Recourse Centre of Khuzestan Province
Abstract
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
Khuzestan province is one of the main hotspots of dust generation in Iran due to special geomorphological and climatic conditions, which expose it to the highest amount of dust. The dust hotspots of Khuzestan are located in seven areas with an area of 350,000 hectares, among them. The dust hotspot in the south and southeast of Ahvaz (dust hotspot No. 4) is the largest and one of the most critical dust hotspots in the province. Rehabilitation projects prioritize this location because of its salinity, alkalinity, and severe climate conditions. Identification of plant species is the first step in rehabilitating these ecosystems that can withstand environmental stress, decrease ecosystem interference, and provide more ecosystem services to local communities while protecting water and soil resources. The above goals can be achieved by planting native species, which also increases the chances of species adaptation (establishment and survival). Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the most suitable species for land reclamation. A researcher is investigating the possibility of planting, establishing, and supplying fodder for four species of halophytes in the Miqan Arak desert. The study's findings indicate that Halimion verrucifera, a native species in the region, is more advantageous in terms of fodder production and palatability. Therefore, cultivation of this species is recommended in this area. In another study, researchers evaluated salt-resistant wood species for land reclamation in Australia. This study focuses on comparing several species from Eucalyptus, Melaleuca, Acacia, and Casuarina in both greenhouse and field conditions. They suggested two species, E. camaldulensis and E. occidentalis, for further and supplementary investigations. Despite the extensive plantings in the Khuzestan dust hotspots in recent years, no research has been conducted to choose the suitable species for land reclamation in these areas. On the other hand dominant species in these projects was Prosopis.juliflora, which is a non-native species. The objective of the current study is to evaluate the establishment, survival, and growth characteristics of Pr. juliflora (Sw.) with 5 species: Tamarix aphylla (L.), Tamarix passerinoides (Delile ex Desv.), Lycium depressum (L.), Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Dehnh.) Seidlitzia rosmarinus (Bunge ex Boiss).
 
Material and Methods
Dust hotspot No 4, Khuzestan is located approximately 25 km southeast of Ahvaz city and along the Ahvaz-Mahshahr highway, at a geographic coordinate system of 48° 47' to 49° 17' east longitude and 30° 15' to 31° 15' north latitude. This region experiences an average rainfall of 218 mm, a maximum temperature of 27.7 degrees Celsius, and a minimum temperature of 24.4 degrees Celsius. The climate of the region is classified as hyper-arid by the de Martonne climate classification method. After selecting the plant species, three levels of salinity were selected: high (61-105 dS/m) (Zone 1), medium (16-60 dS/m) (Zone 2), and low (0-15 dS/m) (Zone 3) with an area of about 30560 m2. 288 seedlings were planted in each salinity level and 864 in total number of seedlings = 3 (different salinity levels) × 6 (different species) × 48 (repetition) (four farrow and 12 repetitions in each farrow). Seedlings were prepared from Dezful, Hamidiyeh, Ramhormoz and Bagh Malik Plant nurseries. Planting distances and dimensions of holes for four species of T.passerinoides, T.aphylla, Pr.juliflora and Eu.camaldulensis were determined as 5 meters and 50x50x50 cm, respectively, and for two species Se.rosmarinus and Ly.depressum, 3 meters and 30x30x30 cm, respectively. After planting the seedlings, the first watering was carried out immediately with an average of 20 liters per seedling hole. Then, watering was done every 10 days until the dry season, and every week during it. Until the seedlings were fully established, livestock was prevented from entering the planted areas with the help of local forces. Measurements were taken after planting the seedlings, including canopy cover (large and small diameter), basal cover, and height of seedlings for every treatment, and replicates three times immediately after planting, six months after planting, and one year after planting. The survival rates were recorded at intervals of six months and one year after planting. The investigated characteristics at different salinity levels were compared using one-way analysis of variance and least significant difference (LSD) methods. The analysis of data was done using SPSS statistical software while graphs were done using EXCEL software.
 
Results and Discussion
The results revealed that among six plant species, T.aphylla, T. passerinoides, Se.rosmarinus and Pr. juliflora with average survival percentage (in all three regions), 95.8, 91.6, 81.9 and 75.6% respectively, had greatest chance to be present in the adverse environmental conditions of this region. Eu. camaldulensis was able to survive in low salinity (66.6%), even though it failed to survive in high salinity and had a very low survival percentage (6.2%) in medium salinity. Ly.depressum's inability to survive in high and medium salinity and a low survival percentage (27%) in low salinity were reasons why it was not recommended for biological rehabilitation projects in similar ecological conditions. The height and canopy cover of all the studied species, except for Pr. juliflora, had significant differences at different salinity levels. It is recommended to plant native plants, such as T. aphylla, T. passerinoides, and Sei. rosmarinus, in this area and areas with similar ecological conditions, based on the results.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abbasi, A., & Malayeri, M. R. (2019). Comparative study of sandstorm properties in Iran and the world in terms of particle size and material. Environmental Researches, 9(18), 53-65. [In Persian]
  2. Adams, M.A., Richter, A., Hill, A.K., & Colmer, T.D. (2005). Salt tolerance in Eucalyptus: identity and response of putative osmolytes. Plant, Cell and Environment, 28(6), 772-787. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01328.x
  3. Akbarian, M., & Biniaz, M. (2011). Evaluation of plant species used in wind erosion control (Case Study Jask city, Hormozgan province. Environmental Erosion Research, 1(2), 29-42. [In Persian]
  4. Al-Jumaily, K.J., & Ibrahim, M. K. (2013). Analysis of synoptic situation for dust storms in Iraq. Energy and Environment, 4(5), 851-858.
  5. Amiri, M., Solaimani, K., & Miryaghoubzadeh, M. (2013). Fuzzy classification for mapping invasive species from multispectral imagery. Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 41, 749-755. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-013-0261-8
  6. Amiri, M., Moslemi, S.M., Tarkesh Esfahani, M., & Shafiezadeh, M. (2023). Ensemble modelling of the potential invasion of Prosopis juliflora (SW.) DC in Makuran region. Environmental Sciences, 21(1), 205-224. DOI: 48308/ENVS.2023.1148 [In Persian]
  7. Arami, S.A., Ownegh, M., Mohammadian Behbahani, A., Akbari, M., & Zarasvandi, A. (2018). The analysis of dust hazard studies in southwest region of Iran in 22 years (1996-2017). Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazarts5(1), 39-66. DOI: 29252/jsaeh.5.1.39  [In Persian]
  8. Arif, A., Ashraf, I., Hussain, M.S., & Iqbal, R. (2024). Salinity tolerance and reclamation potential of two widely distributed subtropical tree species. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 56(4), 1-7. DOI:30848/PJB2024-4(14)
  9. Assarehzadegan, M.A., Khodadadi, A., Amini, A., Shakurnia, A.H., Marashi, S.S., Ali-Sadeghi, H., Zarinhadideh, F., & Sepahi, N. (2015). Immunochemical characterization of Prosopis juliflora pollen allergens and evaluation of cross-reactivity pattern with the most allergenic pollens in tropical areas. Iranian Journal of Allergy and Asthma Immunology, 14(1), 74-82. [In Persian]
  10. Ataiee, H., & Ahmadi, F. (2010). The dust as one of the environmental problems of the Islamic world case study: Khuzestan Province. The Fourth International Congress on Islamic Geographers, Zahedan, Iran. 132p. [In Persian]
  11. Azizi, G., Shamsipour, A., Miri, M., & Safarrad, T. (2012). Statistic and synoptic analysis of dust phenomena in west of Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(3), 123-134. DOI: 22059/JES.2012.29154 [In Persian]
  12. Bestelmeyer, B.T., Ward, J.P., Herrick, J.E., & Tugel, A.J. (2006). Fragmentation effects on soil aggregate stability in patchy arid grassland. Rangeland Ecology & Management Journal, 59(4), 406 - 415. DOI: 2111/05-180R1.1
  13. Cha-um, S., & Kirdmanee, C. (2008). Assessment of salt tolerance in Eucalyptus, rain tree and thai neem under laboratory and the field conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40(5), 2041-2051. DOI: 1023/A:1024474813116
  14. Corney, H.J., Sasse, J.M., & Ades, P.K. (2003). Assessment of salt tolerance in Eucalyptus using chlorophyll fluorescence attributes. New forests, 26(3), 233-246. DOI: 1023/A:1024474813116
  15. Dargahian, F., Lotfinasabasl, S., & Khosroshahi, M. (2019). Analysis of the role of internal dust sources in creating critical conditions in Ahvaz with an emphasis on the southeastern area. Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research16(2), 157-170. DOI: 22092/IJFRPR.2019.118689 [In Persian]
  16. Darvishi Khatooni, J., Narimisa, S., Abasaghi, F., Mohammadi, A., Hamdollahi, M., Salehipour Milani, A., & Asgharipour Dashtbozorg, N. (2017). Composition and source of dust entering Khuzestan province from an external origin. Environmental Sciences15(2), 93-110.  [In Persian]
  17. Dinarvand, M., Keneshloo, H., & Fayyaz, M. (2018). Vegetation of dust sources in Khuzestan Province. Iran Nature, 3(3), 32-42. DOI: 22092/IRN.2018.116781 [In Persian]
  18. Fazlollahi Mohammadi, M., Najafi, A., Soleimani, A., Ezati, S., & Sepahvand, A. (2014). Selection of the most suitable species in order to forestation in southern Zagros forests using AHP & TOPSIS techniques. Ecology of Iranian Forest journal, 2(4), 45-55. [In Persian]
  19. Ghorbanian, D., Ghodrati, M., Sharafieh, H., Mozafari, M., & Moslem, A. (2012). Comparison of cultivation and establishment of different xerophyte species for restoration and enhancement of vegetation in arid lands. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research19(3), 443-456. DOI: 22092/IJRDR.2012.3790 [In Persian]
  20. Goudie, A.S. (2014). Review desert dust and human health disorders. Environment International, 63, 101-113. DOI: 1016/j.envint.2013.10.011
  21. He, Q., Yang, X., Mamtimin, A., & Tang, S.H. (2011). Impact factors of soil wind erosion in the center of Taklimakan Desert. Journal of Arid Land, 3(1), 9-14. DOI: 3724/SP.J.1227.2011.00009
  22. Heidarian, P., Azhdari, A., Jodaki, M., Darvishi Khatooni, J., & Shahbazi, R. (2017). Identifying interior sources of dust storms using remote sensing, GIS and geology (case study: Khuzestan province). Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences27(105), 33-46. DOI: 22071/gsj.2017.53928 [In Persian]
  23. Heydarnezhad, S., Ranjbarfordoei, A., & vali, A. (2015). The Study of changes Photosynthetic Pigment Content, Chlorophyll fluorescence Parameters and Nutrients in Saltwort Plants (Seidlitzia rosmarinus) under Salt Stress. Plant Process and Function, 4(13), 37-45. [In Persian]
  24. Heydarnezhad, S., & Ranjbar fordoei, A. (2022). Effects of salt stress on growth characteristics and ion accumulation in saltwort plants (Seidlitzia rosmarinus). Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 3(4), 1-10. [In Persian]
  25. Jahantigh, M. (2014). The assessment of vegetation changes and their impact on wind erosion in arid areas (Case Study: north of Sistan). 2nd National Conference on desert Management and Approach on arid areas and desert, Semnan, Iran [In Persian]
  26. Javanshir, K., Dastmalchi, H., & Emarati, A. (1997). Ecological and physiological study on Haloxylon aphyllum, Haloxylon persicum, Populus euphratica and Tamarix aphylla in deserts of Iran. Journal of Desert, 1(1-4), 67-79. [In Persian].
  27. Karimi, G., Ghorbanli, M.L., Heidari, H., & Asareh, M. (2007). Investigation of salt tolerance mechanism in range speices of Atriplex verrucifera (M.B). Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi, 19(3), 42-48. [In Persian]
  28. Khosroshahi, M. (2013). Estimating water requirement of Prosopis juliflora at different habitats of Persian Gulf - Aman Sea region of Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research21(2), 300-315. DOI: 22092/IJFPR.2013.3859 [In Persian]
  29. Laeuchi, A., & Luettge, U. (2002). Salinity. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 341 pages.
  30. Levin, N., Kidron, G.H., & Ben-Dor, E. (2006). The spatial and temporal variability of sand erosion across a stabilizing coastal dune field. Sedimentology, 53(4), 697-715. DOI: 1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00787.x
  31. Linders, T.E.W., Schaffner, U., Eschen, R., Abebe, A., Choge, S.K., Kigatu, L., Mbaabu, P.R., Shiferaw, H., & Allan, E. (2019). Direct and indirect effect of invasive species: Biodiversity loss is a major mechanism by which an invasive an invasive tree affects ecosystem functioning. Ecology, 107(6), 2660-2672. DOI: 1111/1365-2745.13268
  32. Madani, S., Ravanbakhsh, M., & Panahandeh, M. (2017). A review of the assessment and management of the ecological risk of invasive plants. Environmental Research and Technology. 2(2), 25-33. DOI: 29252/.2.2.25 [In Persian]
  33. McCary, M.A., Mores, R., Farfan, M.A., & Wise, D.H. (2016). Invasive plants have different effects on tropical structure of green and brown food webs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 19(3), 328-335. DOI: 1111/ele.12562
  34. Mehrabian, A., Khajoei Nasab, F., Naghizadeh, S., & Malek Mohammadi, L. (2021). Distribution patterns of introduced plants of Iran. Applied Ecology, 35(3), 115-157. [In Persian]
  35. Mirdavoodi, H. (2014). Investigation on growth characteristics and establishment of range species in steppe regions of Markazi province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 21(1), 165-175. DOI: 22092/ijrdr.2014.8088 [In Persian]
  36. Mirdavoodi, H. (2014). Investigation on the feasibility of cultivation, establishment and forage quality of four halophytes in Arak Meyghan playa, Iran. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 21(2), 283-294. DOI: 22092/ijrdr.2014.11369[In Persian]
  37. Mwuangi, E., & Swallow, B. (2005). Invasive Prosopis juliflora and local livelihoods; case study from the lake Baringo of Kenya. Working Paper Series, World Agroforestry Centre. 69 pages.
  38. Nadjafi–Tireh–Shabankareh, K., Jalili, A., & Asadpoor, R. (2014). Investigation on invasion effects of Prosopis juliflora (SW.) DC. Journal of Arid Biome4(1), 54-64. [In Persian]
  39. Niknam, S.R., & McComb, J. (2000). Salt tolerance screening of selected Australian woody species- a review. Forest ecology and management. 139(1–3), 1-19. DOI: 1016/S0378-1127(99)00334-5
  40. Ohrtman, M.K., & Lair, K.D. (2013). Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. United States of America: Oxford University Press, 488pages 
  41. Panda, R.M., Behera, M.D., & Roy, P.S. (2018). Assessing distributions of two invasive species of contrasting habits in future climate. Journal of Environmental Management, 213, 478-488. DOI: 1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.053
  42. Pasiecznik, N.M., Harris, P.J.C., & Smith, S. (2003). Identifying tropical Prosopis species: A Field Guide. Henry Doubleday Research Association, United Kingdom, 36 pages.
  43. Qureshi, H., Arshad, M., & Bibi, Y. (2014). Invasive flora of Pakistan: a critical analysis. International Journal of Biosciences, 4(1), 407- 424. DOI: 12692/ijb/4.1.407-424
  44. Rashki, A., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Goudie, A. S., & Kahn, R. A. (2013). Dryness of ephemeral lakes and consequences for dust activity: The case of the Hamoun drainage basin, southeastern Iran. Science of the total environment, 463–464, 552-564. DOI: 1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.045
  45. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. (2017). Report of the comprehensive study on the dust hotspot of Khuzestan, The first phase: Dust hotspot in the south and southeast of Ahvaz, 394 pages. [In Persian]
  46. Rezazadeh, M., Irannejad, P., & Shao, Y. (2013). Climatology of the middle dust events. Aeolian Research, 10,103-109. DOI: 1016/j.aeolia.2013.04.001
  47. Sadeghzadeh Hallaj, H.M., Azadfar, D., & Mirakhori, R. (2015). Growth performance of various population of salt cedar in saline-alkaline soils. Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 22(1), 151-165. [In Persian]      
  48. Sharifian Bahraman, A., Sepehry, A., & Barani, H. (2020). Plant responses to individual and combined effects of abiotic stress: Lycium depressum vegetative parameters under salinity and drought. Journal of Rangeland Science, 10(3), 228-243.
  49. Sharifian Behrman, A., Sepehri, A., & Barani, H. (2021). Investigating the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil of the habitat of the species Kam Tigh in the saline and alkaline pastures of the north of Golestan province. Journal of Plant Ecosystem Protection, 9(2), 62-47. DOI: 22067/JSW.2022.76508.1163 [In Persian]
  50. Suter-Burri, K., Gromke, C.H., Leonard, K.C., & Graf, F. (2013). Spatial patterns of aeolian sediment deposition in vegetation canopies: Observations from wind tunnel experiments using colored sand. Aeolian Research, 8, 65-73. DOI: 1016/j.aeolia.2012.11.002
  51. Tavakoli niya, A., Assareh, M.H., Shariat, A., & Bakhshi -Khaniki, GH.R. (2016). Effects of salinity stress on morphological and physiological parameters in three Eucalyptus species. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 24(1), 42-53. DOI: 22092/IJRFPBGR.2016.106166 [In Persian]
  52. Xu, L., Liu, H., Chu, X., & Su, K. (2006). Desert vegetation pattern at the northern foot of Tianshan mountains: The role of soil conditions. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 201(1), 44-50. DOI: 1016/j.flora.2005.04.003
  53. Yuzhang, L., Guangrong, D., & Changzi, L., (1992). Study on some factors influencing soil erosion by wind tunnel experiment. Journal of Desert Research, 12(4), 41–49.
Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 30
6 Article
Summer 2024
Pages 33-48

  • Receive Date 09 April 2024
  • Revise Date 15 July 2024
  • Accept Date 17 July 2024