Investigating the Vegetation Characteristics of Plant Species That Are Compatible with Protecting Marl Soil in Kashan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Soil Conservtion and Watershed Management Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Expert Researcher, Research Division of Natural Resources, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Research Division of Natural Resources, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Marl formations are one of the most important sources of sediment production in arid and semi-arid regions. Marl lands are highly susceptible to erosion, causing an increase in drinking water treatment costs, reducing the useful life of dams, and significantly decreasing the permeability of floodwater spreading areas.  Different forms of erosion have been shown to have a relationship with the geological characteristics of marls, as evidenced by research. The results of the study of the effect of the physical and chemical properties of marl sediments on erosion in Latshore-Pakdasht showed that the amount of Na+, SO4-2 and silt in the marl lands increased, while the percentage of clay decreased from surface to gully erosion. The form and intensity of water erosion are greatly influenced by changes in soil texture. Gully erosion can be developed by increasing the amount of sand compared to the finer particles of silt and clay. Despite the difficulty of vegetation establishment on marl lands, in some areas, surprisingly, a relatively dense cover of rangeland species can be observed, which can cause erosion control and soil stability. The results of the systematic survey of plant species and their protective role in the marl lands of Ilam, Yazd and Gilan provinces all indicate that rangeland species are one of the most effective and suitable methods to prevent soil erosion by creating a stable vegetation cover on marl formations. The relationship between the physical and chemical properties of the soil with vegetation characteristics including distribution, canopy cover and density is inevitable. In the marl lands of Borujen, the research revealed that vegetation type named Astragalus brachycalyx-Daphne mucronata-Cirsium bracteosum can be established in neutral marl lands, with medium CaCO3 content and minimal presence of Na+ and Cl-. On the other hand, the vegetation type named Astragalus susianus-Daphne mucronata-Amygdalus elaeagnifolia can be established in alkaline and calcareous marl lands with very high amounts of Cl- and can be effective in controlling water erosion in marl lands. Considering arid and desert climate and the occurrence of surface, rill and gully erosions in the marl lands of Kashan region, as well as the importance of protecting and controlling erosion in the marl formations of the region and the lack of detailed vegetation studies
 
in this region, accurate identification of the vegetation of the marl lands and prioritizing native and resistant plant species is necessary for the rehabilitation management of vegetation and biological protection of soil in these areas. Therefore, the aim of the current research is to identify rangeland species and investigate their role in erosion control in the selected marl formations in Kashan. In addition, the physical and chemical soil parameters of marl lands and the vegetation characteristics of plant species in different types of erosion are investigated.
 
Material and Methods
Kashan is one of the marl regions chosen for the current study on the classification and determination of marl erodibility indices in Isfahan province. Two vegetation types named Anabasis setifera-Artemisia sieberi-Salsola tomentosa and Pteropyrum aucheri-Pteropyrum olivieri-Artemisia sieberi have been identified in the selected Marl lands of Kashan. In order to evaluate the erosion condition in three erosion forms of surface, rill and gully, BLM (Bureau of Land Management) form was completed in the same marl units and control areas without vegetation cover. In the next step, three soil samples were collected from 0-20 cm depth in three repetitions in marl units including three forms of erosion. The physical and chemical soil properties including texture, EC, N, P, SAR, OC, CEC, CaSO4 and CaCO3 were measured. For vegetation studies in the study area, after preparing the floristic list of plant species, three 100 m transects were established in a random-systematic method. In each transect 10 plots of 2 m2 were placed and vegetation characteristics including canopy cover percentage and density per plant species, as well as the percentage of gravel and litter were measured and recorded. The statistical analysis of the data was done as a completely random design using SAS software, and the averages of soil properties were compared according to the Least Significant Difference (LSD). Correlation analysis between soil and vegetation characteristics was done by SPSS statistical software.
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that in terms of erodibility, Marl lands with vegetation cover had a better condition than those without vegetation. Based on analysis of variance, the physical and chemical parameters of soil and vegetation characteristics in three types of erosion had significant differences at level of 1% and 5%. In gully erosion, the amount of N, P, SAR, OC, litter and canopy cover were in better conditions compared to other types of erosion. The results of correlation between soil properties and vegetation characteristics showed that the canopy cover had significant correlation with the percentage of sand (r=0.92) and a negative correlation with the amount of CaCO3 at (r=0.97). In terms of the type of dominant plant species, in surface erosion Ephedra strobilacea Bunge. with canopy cover of 1.71%, in rill erosion Anabaisis setifera Moq. with canopy cover of 1.24% and in gully erosion Artemisia sieberi Besser. with canopy cover of 12.3% were identified as the most suitable species for soil protection. In all three types of erosion, bushes had the highest percentage of density in terms of growth form. In surface erosion and gully erosion, shrubs occupied the highest percentage of canopy cover.  In gully erosion, due to better conditions of soil moisture and organic matter, bushes and shrubs were successful in competition with annual and herbaceous plants. They established well due to deep and extensive root system. The results of current research could be considered as a novel achievement in order to prevent soil erosion through establish appropriate species in marl lands with similar climatic conditions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmadpour, M. (2014). Effect of some native grass species on soil conservation of marl lands of Loshan. Ms Thesis, University of Guilan. [In Persian]
  2. Akbarlou, M., YAR, S., &Mohammad Esmaeili, M. (2012). Study on the relashonship between soil physico-chemical proprties and plant communities parameters (Case study: Ghareh Tappeh area, Saveh). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 19(2), 193-199. DOI: 1001.1.23222069.1391.19.2.12.5 [In Persian]
  3. Asgari, Sh.,Peyrowan, H.R., Shadfar, S., & Shoohani, N. (2022). Investigation and identification of plant species compatible with marl soil protection in Ilam city. Geographic Space, 22(77), 81 - 97. DOI: 20.1001.1.1735322.1401.22.77.2.9 [In Persian]
  4. Bahrouji, F., & Peyrowan, H.R. (2020). An accurate and practical analysis for Neogene-marls in Central regions of Iran. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 13(43), 4417-4433. DOI: 17485/IJST/v13i43.1146
  5. Barkhordari, J., Peyrowan, H. R., Shadfar, S., Mirjalili, A., & Hatefi, M. (2022). Investigating the Role of Rangeland Species in the protection of marl formations from erosion in Ardakan – Yazd. Extension and Development of Watershed Managment, 9(33), 39-45. DOI: 20.1001.1.26454777.1400.9.33.5.8 [In Persian]
  6. Borhani, M., & Jabeolansar, Z. (2019). Effects of environmental factors on vegetation in rangelands of Semirom (Isfahan province) using ordination analysis. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 26(3), 741-753. DOI: 22092/ijrdr.2019.120026 [In Persian]
  7. Cardoso, R., & Alonso, E. (2009). Degradation of compacted marls. A micro structural investigation. Soils and Founsitions, 49(3), 315-328. DOI: 3208/sandf.49.315
  8. Darvishzadeh, A. (1991). Geology of Iran. Tehran: Danesh Emrooz Publisher. [In Persian]
  9. Ebrahimi, M., Bashari, H., Bassiri, M., Borhani, M., & Mohajeri, A. (2017). Evaluating vegetation and soil physico-chemical characteristics changes along a grazing gradient using non-metric multi-dimensional scaling analysis (Case study: Morchehkhort rangelands- Isfahan). Journal of Rangeland, 11(1), 106-115. DOI: 1001.1.20080891.1396.11.1.7.4 [In Persian]
  10. Ebrahim-Zadeh, S.A., Aliasgharzad, N., & Najafi, N.A. (2014). Impressionability of some soil ecophysilogical indices by land use changes in Suldoz Plain (Naqadeh, West Azarbaijan). Journal of agricultural science and sustainable production, 23(4), 41-56. [In Persian]
  11. Emami, S.N., & Shirmardi, H.A. (2022). Investigating the habitat requirements of some rangeland plants growing on the soils resulting from the erosion of Gurpi marli formation (Case Study: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province). Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, 29(4), 579-595. DOI: 10.22092/ijrdr.2022.128066 [In Persian]
  12. Erfanzadeh, R., Bahrami, B., Motamedi, J., Dianati Tilaki, G.A., & Abedi, M. (2016). Impact of dominant shrub species on soil organic matter content in dry grassland habitats. Ecopersia,4(2), 1379-1393. DOI: 10.18869/modares.Ecopersia.4. 2.1379
  13. Feizi, M., Alijani, V., Jaberalansar, Z., Khodagholi, M., & Shirani, K. (2017). Ecological Regions of Iran, Vegetatin Types of Esfahan Province. Tehran: Institute of Forest and Rangelands. [In Persian]
  14. Feiznia, S., & Sharifi, F. (2003). Sensitivity of geology formation to erosion in Chandabe basin of Varamin. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 61, 33-38. [In Persian]
  15. Ghasemi Arian, A.R., Fazeli, F., & Rohani, H. (2020). Investigation of Some Ecological Characteristics of Artemisia sieberi and Estimation of its Density by Neural Networks in Roodab Section of Sabzevar. Eco-phytochemical Journal of Medicinal Plants, 7(4), 97-109. DOI: 20.1001.1.23223235.1398.7.4.7.6 [In Persian]
  16. Ghodrati, M., & sobhzahedi, Sh. (2022). Identifying and promoting the coverage of the representative plants in the marl formations of Gilan province (behind the Sefidroud dam). Sustainable Management of Hirkanian Forests, 4(1), 7-16. [In Persian]
  17. Isfahan Meteorological Administration. (2015). Climatic profile of Kashan City. [In Persian]
  18. Jafari Haghighi, M. (2003). Methods of sampling and analysis of soil physical and chemical analysis with emphasis on theory and practical importance. Neda Zoha Press. 236 p. [In Persian]
  19. Koiter, A.J., Owens, P.N., Petticrew, E.L. & Lobb, D.A. (2017). The role of soil surface properties on the particle size and carbon selectivity of interrill erosion in agricultural landscapes. Catena, 153, 194-206. DOI: 1016/j.catena.2017.01.024
  20. Makki, S., Rezaee, P. & Peyrowan, H.R. (2016). Study of effective factors on watererosion in Marl deposits of Mishan and Aghajary formations in the west of BandarAbbas. Quarterly journal of Environmental Erosion Research 6(1), 30-51. DOI: 1001.1.22517812.1395.6.1.3.6 [In Persian]
  21. Martínez-Murillo, J.F., Nadal-Romero, E., Regüés, D., Cerdà, A., & Poesen, J. (2013). Soil erosion and hydrology of the western Mediterranean badlands throughout rainfall simulation experiments: A review. Catena, 106, 101-112. DOI: 1016/j.catena.2012.06.001
  22. Mirdavoudi, H.R., Ghorbanian, D., Zarekia, S., Miri Soleiman, J., Ghonchepur, M., Sweeney, E.M., & Mastinu, A. (2022). Ecological niche modelling and potential distribution of Artemisia sieberi in the Iranian steppe vegetation. Land, 11(12), 2315. DOI: 3390/land11122315
  23. Nikou, Sh. (2014). The study of ecological characteristics of Anabasis aphylla in Dmghan region. Second National Conference on Medicinal Plants and Sustainable Agriculture, Hamedan, Iran. [In Persian]
  24. Nojavan, M., & Gholami, V. (2012). Determination of erosion intensity using Fargas and BLM models Case: Bandre dranage basin. Geography and Development Iranian Journal, 29, 119-130. [In Persian]
  25. Refahi, H.Gh. (2000). Water Erosion and Conservation. Tehran: Tehran university Press. [In Persian]
  26. Rezaei, Kh. (2016). Study of effects of physical and chemical properties of marls on erosion and sediment production of them using rainfall simulator in Lotshour-Pakdasht area. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards, 3(3), 21-40. DOI: 18869/acadpub.jsaeh.3.3.21 [In Persian]
  27. Salmasi, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2012). Relationship between Some properties of marls and different types of erosions in Talkhe-rood watershed. Geography and Environmental Sustainability2(2), 11-23. [In Persian]
  28. Sheikhzadeh, A., Bashari, H., Matinkhah, S.H., Tarkesh Esfahani, M., & Soleimani, M. (2015). Effects of site characteristics and management factors on vegetation distribution in Chadegan experimental range site, Isfahan province. Journal of Rangeland, 9(1), 76-90. DOI: 1001.1.20080891.1394.9.1.7.0 [In Persian]
  29. Sukuti Oskooi, R., Peyrvan, H.R., Nikkami, D., & Mahdian, M. (2015). Investigation on erodibility and soil loss of marly derived soils in west Azerbaijan province, Iran. Watershed Engineering and Management, 7(4), 379-388. [In Persian]
  30. Vannoppen, W., De Baets, S., Keeble, J., Dong, Y., & Poesen, J. (2017). How do root and soil characteristics affect the erosion-reducing potential of plant species? Ecological Engineering, 109, 186-195. DOI: 1016/j.ecoleng.2017.08.001
  31. Yousefi Mobarhan, E., & Peyrowan, H. (2022). Investigating the sustainability and interactive effects of physical-chemical properties of erosion-sensitive marl and rangeland vegetation in arid and semiarid areas (Case Study: Shahrood Town). Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 12(1), 57-74. DOI: 22126/GES.2022.7322.2499 [In Persian]
  32. Zare Chahouki, M.A., & Abbasi, M. (2017). Habitat modeling of Ephedra. Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation, 4(9), 195-212. [In Persian]
  33. Zhang, j., & Dong, T.Y. (2010). Factors affecting species diversity of plant communities and the restoration process in the loess area of china. Ecological Engineering, 36, 345-350. DOI:1016/j.ecoleng.2009.04.001