Desert Management

Desert Management

Habitat Characteristics and the Species Response of Astragalus curvirostris Boiss. to the Environmental Factors in Lorestan Rangelands

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Prof., Forests and Range Lands Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran.
2 Associate Prof, Research institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Prof., Forests and Range Lands Research Department, Markazi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Arak, Iran.
Abstract
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
To analyze complex ecological data, it is necessary to employ flexible and robust analytical methods that can handle non-linear relationships, interactions, and missing data control. The generalized additive model is a simple method for investigating species' reactions to environmental variables, and the results can be easily interpreted. Multivariable regressions such as the Monotonic increase model can play a role in expressing the ecological niche of a particular species. In this ecological domain, non-living and living factors have mutual effects, but the relative importance of living factors, such as species competition, is unclear when compared to non-living factors. More research is necessary for this issue. The response curve studies only investigate the behavior of the species along an environmental gradient, if multiple factors come together to determine the distribution and behavior of the species, it is important to take this into account. The comparison between the findings of researchers in different regions on the species Astragalus curvirostris Boiss consistently shows the extreme effectiveness of the species in terms of environmental factors or their combination. Understanding the relationship between plants and environmental factors and how plants respond to changes in environmental factors is one of the important topics in plant ecology. Unfortunately, in recent years, disturbances such as livestock grazing, changes in land use, and climate change have caused the destruction of A. curvirostris habitats. Many pastures and forests throughout Iran experience vegetation destruction, loss of biodiversity, and soil erosion due to these threats. To restore degraded pastures in steppe and semi-steppe areas, it is necessary to understand A. curvirostris' response to environmental variables and model its distribution. Comprehending the positive and negative effects of environmental factors, as well as the factors that inhibit and support the growth, establishment, and distribution of Astragalus curvirostris Boiss., it became possible to use it for the restoration and modification of appropriate and similar pasture ecosystems.
 
Material and Methods
The habitat of A. curvirostris was selected in a way that includes a wide range of abundance of the studied species. Therefore, according to the 40-hectare enclosure range in the research site of Zaghe rangelands plants in Lorestan province, this habitat was selected as a study site. Then, according to the gradient of environmental changes, five transects with a length of 400 meters and distances of 100 meters were used. Each of them had six plots with dimensions of 4 meters by 4 meters set up according to the species' sizes, with equal distances. The ecological unit consisted of 30 plots and recorded the geographic location, quantitative and qualitative vegetation amounts in each plot. Additionally, the Lorestan Meteorological Department provided climatic parameters. In order to investigate the effect of environmental factors on species distribution, a soil sample with three replicates (0-30 cm) was taken from each of the plots and their physical and chemical characteristics including soil texture, acidity, percentage of neutralized substances, absorbable phosphorus, absorbable potassium, organic carbon and total nitrogen were measured. Considering the importance of species in fodder production and soil protection in pastures, the canonical correspondence analysis was used to determine the factors affecting changes in the species composition. To investigate the changes in the performance of this species along the slope of the environmental factors from the Generalized Additive Models was used. A random-systematic method was used to sample environmental and plant characteristics from 2016 to 2018.
 
Results and Discussion
The forward selection method in conic ranking was used to select 4 variables from 19 primary variables while investigating the effect of a set of environmental factors on vegetation changes in communities. The geographical direction of the range was determined by the percentage of organic carbon, clay, acidity, and litter on the soil surface, as well as the topographic group. Investigating the correlation between the percentage of A. curvirostris vegetation and the studied ecological factors showed that distribution of this species has positive correlation with factors such as the percentage of O.C and N. Applying the GAM with Poisson error distribution showed that the variables, height above sea level, percentage of organic matter and soil nitrogen, as well as the percentage of stone are effective on the yield of the species. Investigating the performance of the species in relation to the variable of height above sea level, and the percentage of stones and pebbles from the Monotonic decrease model and vice versa, the response of this species along the slope of changes in the amount of organic carbon, soil nitrogen and the percentage of soil litter from the Monotonic increase model mathematical expression of relationships between environmental variables and biological and biophysical characteristics is only an aid for interpreting field observations. The ecological needs of the species are depicted in this model, which can be useful for natural resource managers in improving pastures in similar areas. Corrective and pasture management programs can use forecasting models that have adequate accuracy to suggest species that are compatible with the region's conditions. Therefore, it is important to include disturbances as predictors in regression-based distribution modeling. In summary, the dynamic of biological factors in grassland ecosystems makes it impossible to definitively assume even the strongest correlations, both in static and dynamic studies, in grassland ecosystems. This information, along with the field investigation, provides the appropriate information.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Aghajanlou, F., Mirdavoudi, H., Shojaee, M., MacSweeney, E., Mastinu, A., & Moradi, P. (2021). Rangeland management and ecological adaptation analysis model for Astragalus curvirostris Horticulturae, 7(4), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7040067  
  2. Akaike, H. A. (1974). New look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 19, 716–723.
  3. Akhani, H., Mahdavi, P., Noroozi, J., & Zarrinpour, V. (2013). Vegetation patterns of the Irano-Turanian steppe along a 3000 m al-titudinal gradient in the Alborz Mountains of Northern Iran. Folia Geobotanica., 48, 229–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-012-9147-8 
  4. Alavi, J., Zahedi Amiri, G., Rahmani, R., Marvi Mohajer, M,. Muys, B., & Fathi, J. (2011). 'Extracting ecological optimum and amplitude of Fagus orientalis along environmental gradients in Kheyrud forest, Nowshahr', Journal of Natural Environment, 64(4), pp. 399-415.
  5. Arzani, H. & Abedi, M. (2014). Rangeland assessment, vegetation measurement. Tehran University. 305p. [In Persian].
  6. Austin, M. P., Belbinb, J.A., Meyers, M., Dohertya, M.D., & Luotoc, M. (2006). Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: Role of artificial data and theory. Ecological Modelling, 199(2),197-216. DOI:1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.023
  7. Balent, G., & Stafford Smith, D. M. (1991). Conceptual model for evaluating the consequences of management practices on the use of pastoral resources. In Proceedings of the fourth International Rangeland Congress, Montpellier, France, 22–26.
  8. Beers, T.W., Dress, P.E., & Wensel, L. C. (1966). Aspect trans-formation in site productivity research. Journal of Forestry. 64, 691–692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/64.10.691
  9. Esfanjani, J., Zare Chahouki, M. A., Rouhani, H., Esmaeli, M. & Behmanesh, B. (2016). Suitibility habitat modeling species using ecological niche factor analysis (ENFA) in rangelands Chaharbagh of Golestan province, Iran', Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 23(3), pp. 516-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2021.107608 [In Persian].
  10. Haghian, I., & Sharafatmandrad, M. (2019). Identification of physical and chemical soil factors effects on medical plants distribution with use ordination method (Case Study: Deraseleh rangeland, Savadkouh, Mazandaran Province). Journal of Agroecology, 11(4), 1327-1341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/­JAG.V11I4.61976 [In Persian]
  11. Ghelichnia, H., Mirdavoodi, H., & Cherati, A. (2023). The study of habitats properties and response pattern of Astragalus retamocarpus Boissier & Hohen. to environmental factors in rangelands of Mazandaran province. Journal of Rangeland, 17(2), 216-231. DOI: 1001.1.20080891.1402.17.2.4.5 [In Persian]
  12. Gogina, M. (2010). Investigation of Interrelations between Sediment and Near-Bottom Environmental Parameters and Macrozoobenthic Distribution Patterns for the Baltic Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  13. Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C., & Hastie, T. (2002). Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological medelling, 157(2-3), 89-100. DOI: 1016/s0304-3800(02)00204-1
  14. Hosseini, A. (2012). The study of quality and quantity some of foage Astragalus species in Golestan national park. Journal of Protection and Exploitation of Natural Resources, 1(2), 45-56. [In Persian]
  15. Jaberalansar, Z., Borhani, M., Bahreininejad, B., & Mirdavodi, H. (2021). Habitat study of Krascheninnikovia ceratoides (L.) Guldenst rangeland response pattern to environmental factors in Isfahan province. Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert research, 28(3), 551-563. DOI: https://doi.org/­10.22092/ijrdr.2021.125015 [In Persian]
  16. Jafari, M., Chahouki, M.A.Z., Tavili, A., Azarnivand, H. & Amiri, G.Z. (2004). Effective environmental factors in the distribution of vegetation types in Poshtkouh rangelands of Yazd Province (Iran). Journal of Arid Environments. 56, 627–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00077-6
  17. Jayaraman, S., Sahu, M., Sinha, N.K., Mohanty, M., Chaudhary, R.S., Yadav, B., Srivastava, L.K., Hati, K.M., Patra, A.K., & Dalal, R.C. (2022). Conservation agricultural practices impact on soil organic carbon, soil aggregation and greenhouse gas emission in a Vertisol. Agriculture, 12(7), 1004. DOI: https://doi.org/­10.3390/agriculture12071004
  18. Kamali, P., Heshmati, G., Sepehri, A., & Ahmadi, V. (2017). 'Effects of nanoclay particles contained-acrylic resin and plant mulch on morphological characteristics of pistachio (Pistaciavera L.) in Gorgan rangeland, Esfarāyen', Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 8(2), pp. 101-113. [In Persian]
  19. Khalasi Ahvazi, L., Zare Chahouki, M. A., & Ghorbannezhad, F. (2013). Comparing discriminant analysis, ecological niche factor analysis and logistic regression methods for geographic distribution modelling of Eurotia ceratoides (L.) C. A. Mey. Journal of Rangeland Science, 3(1), 45-57. DOI: 1001.1.20089996.2013.3.1.6.2
  20. Khoury, C. K., Greene, S., Wiersema, J., Maxted, N., Jarvis, A. & Struik, P. C. (2013). An inventory of crop wild relatives of the United States. Crop Science. 53, 1496–1508. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2012.10.0585
  21. Laris, P., & Wardell, D. A. (2006). Good, bad or ‘necessary evil’? Reinterpreting the colonial durning experiment in savanna landscapes of West Africa. Geographical Journal, 172, 271–290.
  22. Mahmoodian Chooplu, A., Dianati Tilaki, G., & Alavi, S. J. (2017). Investigating Aeluropus lagopoides and Salsola turcomanica response curves to some environmental gradients using HOF function in Inchehboroun rangelands. Journal of Rangeland, 10(3), 268-281. DOI: 1001.1.20080891.1395.10.3.3.7 [In Persian]
  23. Masoumi, A.A., (2005). The Genus Astragalus in Iran, Research institute of forest and rangeland [In Persian].
  24. Masoumi, A.A., (2016). The role of Astragalus in ecosystem equilibrium. Iran Nature, 1(1), 47-41. DOI: 22092/IRN.2016.107529 [In Persian]
  25. Moisen, G. G., & Frescino, T. S. 2002. Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecological Modelling, 157, 209–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S03043800(02)00197-7
  26. Mukaro, E., Nyakudya, I. W. & Jimu, L. (2017). Edaphic conditions, aboveground carbon stocks and plant diversity on nickel mine tailings dump vegetated with Senegalia polyacantha (Willd.) Seigler & Ebinger. Land Degrad. Dev. 28, 1641–1651. DOI:1002/ldr.2696
  27. Pourbabaei, H., Rahimi, V. & Adel. M. N. (2015). Effect of environmental factors on rangeland vegtation distribu-tion in Divan-Darre area, Kurdistan. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 4(11), 27-39.‎ DOI: 18869/acadpub.ijae [In Persian]
  28. Shahsavarzadeh, R., Tarkesh, M., Rahmati, Z., & Ghazizadeh, M. (2016). Potential habitat modelling Ferula ovina using by genetic algorithms in Ferydoun shahr, Isfahan. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 31(6), 977-987. DOI: 10.22092/ijmapr.2016.105887 [In Persian]
  29. Stewart, P. S., Stephens, P. A., Hill, R. A., Whittingham, M. J., & Dawson, W. (2022). Model selection in occupancy models: Inference versus prediction. BioRxiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3942 
  30. Ter Braak, C.J.F., (1985). Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics, 41(4), 859–873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2530959
  31. Ter Braak, C. J. F., & Smilauer, P. (2002). Canoco, reference manual and Cano draw for windows user’s guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination, version 4.5; Microcomputer Power: Ithaca,
  32. Traore, S., Zerbo, L., Schmidt, M., & Thiombiano, L. (2012). Acacia communities and species responses to soil and climate gradients in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of west Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 87, 144-152. DOI:1016/j.jaridenv.2012.07.010
  33. Wang, G., Yang, Y., Kong, Y., Ma, R., Yuan, J., & Li, G. (2022). Key factors affecting seed germination in phytotoxicity tests during sheep manure composting with carbon additives. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 421, 126809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126809
  34. Wassie, A., Sterck, F. JTeketay, D., & Bongers, F. (2009). Effects of livestock exclusion on tree regeneration in church forests of Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management. 257, 765–772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.032
  35. Whittaker, R.H. (1973). Direct Ggradient Analysis. Handbook of vegetation science 5: Ordination and classification of communities; Whittaker, R.H., Ed.; Junk Publishers: Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 19–50.
Volume 12, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29
6 Article
Spring 2024
Pages 85-100

  • Receive Date 19 February 2024
  • Revise Date 15 March 2024
  • Accept Date 18 March 2024