Investigation of Different Grazing Intensities on Rangeland Production Quality and Quantity and Soil Carbon in Khabr Rangelands of Baft

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Ecological Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Ecological Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran.

3 Department of rangeland and watershed management, Faculty of Agriculture, Fasa University, Fasa , Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Rangeland provides numerous ecosystem goods and services. Most rangeland management decisions focus on forage production, and this can lead to the loss of other rangeland ecosystem services. One of those services is carbon sequestration, the removal of carbon dioxide from the Earth's atmosphere and its storage in the ground. Rangeland, which covers approximately half of terrestrial ecosystems, is one of the most important sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide. Photosynthesis, respiration and decomposition are the main processes in the ecosystem that determine how carbon is stored in the soil. Anthropogenic activities like livestock grazing can significantly alter soil carbon storage. Unfortunately, human activities have resulted in lower soil carbon and increased global climate change. Livestock grazing is one of the most significant factors affecting the structure and functioning of ecosystems. Grazing livestock can affect the amount of carbon in the soil through reduced vegetation cover, altered species composition, soil degradation, urination and defecation. On the other hand, changes in the quantity and quality of forage production by livestock grazing have a strong effect on the welfare of the beneficiaries. Consequently, knowledge of the relationship between forage production and other ecosystem goods and services such as soil carbon is essential to the sustainability of ecosystems. It is important to study the quantity and quality changes in rangeland production in relation to different livestock grazing intensities on soil carbon. However, this information can assist range managers in providing techniques to promote soil carbon storage. The purpose of the study is 1) to determine annual forage production in rangelands at different grazing intensities, 2) to study the quality of rangeland forages produced, 3) to assess soil carbon content at different grazing intensities, and 4) to assess the relationship between rangeland production and soil carbon content at different grazing intensities.
 
Material and Methods
A rangeland adjacent to Khabr National Park in Kerman province was selected as the study area. The study area is shrub- dominated species Artemisia aucheri Boiss. Three sites with different grazing intensities (for example, exclosure, high grazing and moderate grazing) were sampled. At
 
each site, three 100m transects with 50m intervals were set up. Ten quadrats were randomly assigned to each transect. For each quadrat, the species met were recorded and their number of individuals and the amount of forage produced were measured. The annual forage production (forage quantity) was measured using the clip and weigh method. To determine forage quality, crude protein, acid detergent fibre (ADF), dry matter digestion and metabolizable energy were estimated for each species. Additionally, a soil sample was taken from each of the quadrats. The samples were air-dried and sieved with a 2 mm sieve. The organic carbon of the soil samples was determined through wet oxidation with Walkley-Black chromic acid. Then, the species importance index (IVI) was estimated using relative frequency (Fr), relative density (Dr) and relative dominance (Dor). One-way ANOVA and LSD were used to compare different grazing intensities in terms of soil carbon, annual production, crude protein, ADF and metabolizable energy. Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationship between soil carbon and annual production with the qualitative attributes of production, ie. The primary component analysis (PCA) was used to identify the most important species in terms of production at the three sites with different grazing intensities (exclosure, high grazing and moderate grazing). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to identify the most important species in terms of production at the three sites with differing grazing intensities (exclosure, high grazing and moderate grazing).
 
Results and Discussion
The quantity and quality of forage has been reduced in the livestock grazing sites. The study area has a long history of cattle grazing, which has significantly altered the composition of the vegetation. About 26% of the exclosure site species had been removed from the plant composition of medium pasture sites, most of which are appetizing species. Although the amount of organic carbon in the soil increased at the exclosure site, it was not significantly different from grazing sites. Therefore, despite the improvement in forage quality and quantity, soil organic carbon had shown a lower reaction to the exclosure. Due to the presence of acceptable species, there was a positive relationship between forage quantity and quality at the exclosure site. Although A. aucheri was still dominant shrub species in the site with medium grazing intensity, there was no significant relationship between forage quantity and quality due to the decrease of palatable species. With the increase in the number of non-platable species in the high grazing site, there was a significant negative relationship between forage quantity and quality. There was a positive and meaningful relationship between soil carbon and the amount and quality of forage at the exclos site. The relationship between soil carbon and forage quantity and quality was not significant on grazing sites because of a change in plant composition. In the sites under grazing, palatable forbs such as Tragopogon jesdianus Boiss. and Lathyrus annuus L. were not observed and perennial grasses were significantly reduced. It should be noted that forage production of forbs has not changed much on the site with average grazing compared to the exclosure site. Perennials, especially woody plants, were severely reduced at the site with high grazing intensity. There were no bushes observed at that location. Annual grasses had increased in the site with heavy browsing. As perennials decrease, space and resources become available for the invasion of annual plants, especially annual grasses. Therefore, Bromus tectorum L. had the highest forage production in the   high grazing area. In terms of crude protein, the high grazing area had low quality forage. Since livestock grazing and subsequent changes in plant composition do not greatly impact soil carbon, livestock management can contribute to the improvement of plant composition and forage production at this site. Taking into account the impact of grassland management on other ecosystem functions, it is suggested to explore the relationship between the amount of production and other functions of quality rangeland ecosystems in order to sustainably manage rangeland ecosystems.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abaye, A.O., Webb, D.M., Zipper, C., & Luginbuhl, J. (2011). Managing shrub-infested, postmined pasturelands with Goats and cattle part II. Effects on forage biomass, nutritive values and animal performance. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  2. Abdi, N., Maddah Arefi, H., & Zahedi Amiri, Gh. (2008). Estimation of carbon sequestration in Astragalus rangelands of Markazi province (Case study: Malmir rangeland in Shazand region). Iranian journal of Range and Desert Reseach, 15(2), 269-282. [In Persian]
  3. Aldezabal, A., Saitua, L.M., Odriozola, I., & Mijangos, I. (2015). Impact of grazing abandonment on plant and soil microbial communities in an Atlantic mountain grassland. Applied Soil Ecology, 96, 251-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.013
  4. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  5. Arzani, H., Tarnian, F., Motamedi, J., & Khodagholi, M. (2014). Investigation on forage quality of range species in steppe rangelands of Maime, Isfahan. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 21(2), 198-207. [In Persian]
  6. Bahrami, B., Erfanzadeh, R., & Motamedi, J. (2013). Effect of slope and vegetation on carbon sequestration in a semi-dry rangeland of western Iran, case study: Khanghah Sorkh, Urmia. Journal of Water and Soil, 27(4), 703-711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.28088 [In Persian]
  7. Bassel, G.W., Fung, P., Chow, T.F., Foong, J.A., & Provartand Cutler, S.R. (2008). Elucidating the germination ranscriptional program using small molecules. Plant Physiology, 147(1), 143-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.110841
  8. ‎Bernués, A., Riedel, J.L., Asensio, M. A., & Blanco, M. (2005). An integrated approach to studying the ‎role of grazing livestock systems in the conservation of rangelands in a protected natural park (Sierra ‎de Guara, Spain). Livestock Production Science, 96(1), 75-85‎. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.05.023
  9. Briske, D.D., Derner, J.R., Brown, S.D., Fuhlendorf, W.R., & Teague, K.M. (2008). Rotational grazing on rangelands: reconciliation of perception and experimental Evidence. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 61(1), 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2111/06-159R.1
  10. Buwai, M., & Trlica, M.J. (1977). Multiple defoliation effects on herbage yield, vigor, and total nonstructural carbohydrates of five range species. Journal of Range management, 30, 164-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3897460
  11. Coulloudon, B., Eshelman, K., Gianola, J., Habich, N., Hughes, L., Johnson, C., Pellant, M., Podborny, P., Rasmussen, A., Robles, B., & Shaver, P. (1999). Sampling vegetation attributes, technical reference 1734-4. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Grazing Land Technology Institute.
  12. Dormar, J.F., Smoliak, S., & Willms, W.D., (1989). Vegetation and soil responses to short- duration grazing on Fescue Grassland. Journal of Range Management, 42(3), 252-256. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3899484
  13. Duniway, M.C., & Herrick, J.F. (2013). Assessing impacts of roads: application of a standard assessment protocol. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 66(3), 364-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00130.1
  14. ‎ (2010). Challenges and opportunities for carbon sequestration in grassland systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
  15. Foroughbakhch, R., Hernandez-Piñero, J., Carrillo-Parra, A., & Rocha-Estrada, A. (2013). Composition and animal preference for plants used for goat feeding in semiarid Northeastern Mexico. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23(4), 1034-1040. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.1299.1305
  16. ‎Fynn, A. J., Alvarez, P., Brown, J.R., George, M.R., Kustin, S., Laca, E.A., Oldfield, J.T., Schohr, T., ‎Neely, C.L., Wong, C.P. (2010). Soil carbon sequestration in United States rangelands. Eds: Abberton M., Conant R., & Batello C. Grassland carbon sequestration: management, policy. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy.
  17. Gavili Kilaneh, E., & Vahabi, M.R. (2012). The effect of some soil characteristics on range vegetation distribution in central Zagros, Iran. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 16(59), 245-258. [In Persian]
  18. Golluscio, R.A., Austin, A.T., García Martínez, G., Gonzalez-Polo, M., Sala, O.E., & Jackson, R.B. (2009). Sheep grazing decreases organic carbon and nitrogen pools in the Patagonian steppe: combination of direct and indirect effects. Ecosystems, 12(4), 686–697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9252-6
  19. Heydari, G. A., Saeidi, G. H. (2014) Compare of Changes diversity and richnes of plant species and plant forms in three utilization sites (Case study: southern slopes of Damavand mountain Summer Rangeland). Range and Watershed management, 66(4), 535-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2014.50029 [In Persian]
  20. Hillenbrand, M., Thompson, R., Wang, F., Apfelbaum, S., & Teaguec, R. (2019). Impacts of holistic planned grazing with bison compared to continuous grazing with cattle in South Dakota short grass prairie. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 279, 156–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.02.005
  21. Hobbs, N.T. (1996). Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60(4), 695-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3802368
  22. ‎Hu, T., & Chabbi, A. (2022). Grassland management and integration during crop rotation impact soil ‎carbon changes and grass-crop production. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 324(1), 107703. DOI: ‎ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107703
  23. Jeddi, K., & Chaieb, M. (2010). Changes in soil properties and vegetation following livestock grazing exclusion in degraded arid environments of South Tunisia. Flora, 205(3), 184–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2009.03.002
  24. Joneydi Jafari, H., Azarnivand H., Zare CHahoki, M.A., & Jafari, M. (2013). Study of aboveground and belowground biomass of Artemisia sieberi shrublands with different grazing intensities in Semnan province. Pajouhesh- Va- Sazandegi, 99, 33-41. [In Persian]
  25. Kohandel, A., Arzani, H., & Tavasol, M.H. (2009). Effect of different grazing in intensities on nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic matter in stepi Savojbolagh rangelands. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, 3(6), 59-65. [In Persian]
  26. Kohestani, N., Rastgar, Sh., Heydari, G., Shetaee Jouibary, S., & Amirnejad, H. (2021). Monitoring the spatial distribution of soil carbon sequestration for four decades based on changes in rangeland vegetation conditions (Case study: Noorrud watershed in Mazandaran province). Journal of Rangeland, 15(4), 344-356. [In Persian]
  27. Lee, M.A. (2018). A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments. Journal of Plant Research, 131, 641–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1024-y
  28. Li, W., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Shi, S., & Cao, W. (2018). Six years of grazing exclusion is the optimum duration in the alpine meadow-steppe of the north-eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35273-y
  29. Louhaichi, M., Salkini, A.K., Petersen, S.L. (2009). Effect of small ruminant grazing on the plant community characteristics of semiarid Mediterranean ecosystems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11, 681–689.
  30. Ma, W.H., Fang, J.Y., Yang, Y.H., & Mohammat, A. (2010). Biomass carbon stocks and their changes in northern China's grasslands during 1982-2006. Journal of Science China Life Sciences, 53(7), 841-850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-010-4020-6
  31. ‎MacDicken, K.G. (1997). A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry and agroforestry projects. ‎Winrock Internationl Institute for Agricultural Development, Forest Carbon Monitoring Program.‎
  32. ‎Mandal, G., & Josh, Sh.P. (2014). Analysis of vegetation dynamics and phytodiversity from three dry ‎deciduous forests of Doon Valley, Western Himalaya, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 7(3), ‎‎292-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2014.07.006
  33. ‎Medina-Rold, E., Paz-Ferreiro, J., & Bardgett, R.D. (2012). Grazing exclusion affects soil and plant ‎communities, but has no impact on soil carbon storage in an upland grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 149, 118–23‎. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.012
  34. Mesdaghi, M. (2021). Statistical methods an applied approach to natural sciences. Ferdowsi University Mashhad Press. Iran. [In Persian]
  35. Mirzaali, E., Erfanzadeh, R., & Mesdaghi, M. (2006). The study of effects of exclosure on vegetation and soil surface in saline ranges of Gomishan, Golestan province. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, 13(2), 194-201. [In Persian]
  36. Mohamadi, A.M., Mousavi, S.A., Kiani, Gh., & Soltani Koupaei, S. (2022). The rangeland users’ willingness to be paid for reduction of grazing pressure in Bardeh and Karsanak Rangelands. Journal of Rangeland, 16(1), 158-173. [In Persian]
  37. Mohebali, A., Erfanzadeh, R., & Jafari, M. (2021). Different effects of woody species with different crown structure on some of the most important qualitative characteristics of soil (Case study: rangelands of Haluposhteh, Baladeh Noor, Mazandaran province). Journal of Rangeland, 15(1), 110-122. [In Persian]
  38. ‎Nelson, D.W., & Sommers, L.E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon‏, ‏‎ organic matter. ‎In: Page, A.L., ‎Miller, R.H., Kenney, D.R. (Eds‏.(,‏‎ Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, ‎‎2nd Edition. Agronomy ‎Monograph 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, ‎Wisconsin‏, ‏‎ USA, pp. 539–580.‎
  39. Nikan, M., Ejtehadi, H., Farzam, M., Memariani, F., Hasanpour, H., & Noadoost, F. (2012). Floristic composition and plant diversity under different grazing intensities: case study semi steppe rangeland, Baharkish, Quchan. Iranian Journal Range and Desert Resources, 19(2), 306-320. [In Persian]
  40. Niknahad Gharmakher, H., Jafari footami, I., & Sheidai Karkaj, E. (2014). Effect of enclosure restoration practices on physical and chemical soil properties in Arid Region of Maraveh Tapeh, Golestan Province. Applied soil, 1(2), 114-124. [In Persian]
  41. Nikoo, Sh., & Rahimi Dehcheraghi, M. (2016). Effects of various grazing intensities on quantitative and qualitative forage characteristics of Artemisia Sieberi (Case study: Ghooshe and Lookeh In Semnan province). Rangeland, 10(3), 282-290. [In Persian]
  42. Oddy, V.H., Robards, G.E., & Low, S.G. (1983). Prediction of In-vivo Dry Matter Digestibility from the Fiber and Nitrogen Content of a Feed, In Feed Information and Animal Production. Eds Roberds G.E. and Packham R.G. Commonw Ealth Agriculture Bureaux. Australia, PP 395-398.
  43. ‎Oñatibia, G., Aguiar, M.R., & Semmartin, M. (2015). Are there any trade-offs between forage provision ‎and the ecosystem service of C and N storage in arid rangelands? Ecological Engineering, 77(1), 26–32.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.009
  44. Oñatibia, G.R., & Aguiar, M.R. (2019). Grasses and grazers in arid rangelands: Impact of sheep management on forage and non-forage grass populations. Journal of Environmental Management, 235(1), 42- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.037
  45. Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11), 559–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720
  46. Pfeiffer, M., Langan, L., Linstädter, A., Martens, C., Gaillard, C., Ruppert, J.C., Higgins, S.I., Mudongo, E.I., & Scheiter, S. (2019). Grazing and aridity reduce perennial grass abundance in semi-arid rangelands Insights from a trait-based dynamic vegetation model. Ecological Modelling, 395(1), 11-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.12.013
  47. Pichand, M., & Amiri, S. (2021). Investigating the effects of range management plans on condition, production and rangeland’s trend of rudan and hajiaba cities, Hormozgan province, Iran. Journal of Rangeland, 15(1), 134-145 [In Persian]
  48. Pournemati, A., & Ghornani, A. (2022). The impact of temperature and rainfall fluctuations on aboveground net primary production of rangeland plants of Sabalan. Journal of Rangeland, 15(4), 573-588. [In Persian]
  49. Pringle, M.J., Allen, D.E., Dalal, R.C., Payne, J.E., Mayer, D.G., O'Reagain P., & Marchant, B.P. (2011). Soil carbon stock in the tropical rangelands of Australia: Effects of soil type and grazing pressure, and determination of sampling requirement. Geoderma, 167-68, 261-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.09.001
  50. Rashvand, S., Safari, H., & Ashouri sanjabi, P. (2012). Sustainability of forage production of some rangeland species using univariate method in mountainous rangelands of Middle Alborz, Qazvin province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 19(2), 355-365. [In Persian]
  51. Raufirad, V., Ebrahimi, A. Davarzani, H., & ShojaeiAsadeiye, Z. (2013). Investigation on relationship between platability and forage quality in some of rangeland (case study: Karsanak rangelands of chaharmahal-Va-Bakhtiari province). Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 66(1), 111-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2013.35332 [In Persian]
  52. Schuman, G.E., Janzen, H.H., & Herrick, J.E. (2002). Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environmental pollution, 116(3), 391–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00215-9
  53. Seneviratne, G. (2000). Litter quality and nitrogen release in tropical agriculture: A synthesis. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 31, 60- 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050624
  54. Shakeri, P., Fazaeli, H., Pourmirzaee, A., & Mostafavi, S.H. (2019). Investigation on forage quality of four range species of compositae family (A case study in rangelands of Baft in Kerman province). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 25(4), 735-747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2019.118473 [In Persian]
  55. Shokrollahi, SH., Moradi, H.R., & Dianati Tilaki, Gh.A. (2012). Effects of soil properties and physiographic factors on vegetation cover (Case study: Polur Summer Rangelands). Iranian journal of Range and Desert Reseach, 19, 668-655 [In Persian].
  56. Tahmasebi, P., Manafian, N., Ebrahimi, A., Omidipour, R., & Faal, M. (2020). Managing grazing intensity linked to forage quantity and quality trade-off in Semiarid Rangelands. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 73(1), 53-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.08.011
  57. Tarhouni, M., Ben Salem, F., Ouled Belgacem, A., & Neffati, M. (2010). Acceptability of plant species along grazing gradients around watering points in Tunisian arid zone. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 205(7), 454-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.020
  58. ‎Thapa, Sh.K., Kumar, Sh., de Jong, J.E., Subedi, N., Hof, R., Corradini, G., Basnet, S., & Prins, H.H.T. (2021). Forage quality in grazing lawns and tall grasslands in the subtropical region of Nepal and ‎implications for wild herbivores. Global Ecology and Conservation, 30, e01747‎. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01747
  59. Wang, G., Mao, J., Fan, L., Ma, X., & Li, Y. (2022). Effects of climate and grazing on the soil organic ‎carbon dynamics of the grasslands in Northern Xinjiang during the past twenty years. Global Ecology ‎and Conservation, 34, e02039‎‏.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02039
  60. Wang, K., Deng, L., Ren, Z., Li, J., & Shangguan, Z. (2016). Grazing exclusion significantly improves grassland ecosystem C and N pools in a desert steppe of Northwest China. Catena, 137, 441-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.018
  61. Yan, L., Zhou, G., & Zhang, F. (2013). Effects of different grazing intensities on grassland production in China: A Meta-Analysis. PloS one, 8(12), e81466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081466
  62. ‎Yujie, L., Wenchao, Y., Hui, W., Xin, L., Gang, L., Jianning, Zh., &‏ ‏ Dianlin, Y. (2014). Effects of rest ‎grazing on organic carbon storage in Stipa Baicalensis steppe in Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica ‎Sinica, 34, 170–177. DOI:‎ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.11.010
  63. Zare Chahouki, M.A., Mashgholi, M., & Jafari, H. (2016). Classification of vegetation cover related to environmental factors (Case study: Gharabagh Rangelands of Azarbaijan province). Journal of Plant Research, 28, 995-1005. ‎[In Persian]‎