Identifying and Determining the Length of The Greenhouses Cultivation Period Using Aerial Photos and Sentinel-2 Images

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, Department of Geography, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Over the past 60 years, the use of plastic covers as a tool to increase the harvest and increase the yield of horticultural crops has steadily increased worldwide. Plastic greenhouses have turned desert areas into areas with modern agricultural development, the province of Almera in the south of Spain is a good example. It now has many greenhouses, making it a global model of agricultural development; but greenhouses contain large quantities of phthalates and cause harm to people, like hormonal disturbances, heart problems, cancer, etc. However, plastic greenhouses are widely built to produce vegetables and fruits near cities. As a result, several remote sensing methods have been developed to identify and monitor the distribution of plastic covered greenhouses in order to manage water resources, identify sites and quantities of plastic greenhouses. Remote detection is the only practical method to monitor plastic greenhouses in a vast geographic area. In the past few years, there have been few studies using high spatial resolution images. In one study, three main absorption ranges were identified that are unaffected by dust, washing and surface factors. In Spain, an artificial intelligence neural network has been proposed to identify greenhouse using Quick Bird images with a resolution of 1.5m. Studies based on medium spatial resolution imagery were also conducted, resulting in different results. In search on land cover classification using Landsat TM images, no favorable results were found. Research has proposed a new method for mapping greenhouses using Sentinel-2 dual-time images and 1D-CNN deep learning. The aim of the current research is to identify the length of the cultivation period of greenhouse crops using Sentinel-2 satellite images. Researchers used a variety of satellite imagery to identify and classify greenhouses. The innovative objective of the current research is to evaluate the Sentinel-2 satellite images in determining the length of the cultivation period of greenhouse crops; which was done for the first time within the country.
 
Material and Methods
In the first step, the cultivated area of greenhouses was identified using an aerial photograph. Then, useful bands were extracted in greenhouse studies using Sentinel-2 time series images. Next, vegetation and plastic cover indices were calculated for the greenhouse growing period.


 
1) Identify and determine the area under cultivation in greenhouses: By comparing the pixel-based classification algorithms and the object-oriented classification algorithms, the cultivated area of greenhouses was identified. ENVI and eCognition software were used for pixel-based classification and object-oriented classification, respectively. It should be noted that only one aerial photograph with three bands, blue, green and red, has been used in object-oriented classification. In order to classify the base pixel, learning samples were selected using expert knowledge from the study area. In some instances, Google Earth was used as well. Learning samples were selected scattered across the image to improve accuracy. For validation of the maps obtained from these algorithms, ground control points were used. To reduce human error, these points were also entered into Google Earth. 2) Identifying functional bands in the greenhouse study: The spectral behavior curve of different earth surface covers in Blue, Green, Red, SWIR, NIR bands was drawn in an image of the Sentinel-2 satellite. These spectral signatures were compared on May 20, 2020 i.e., when outdoor vegetation and greenhouse cultivation were at their peak. 3) Determining the duration of the greenhouse growing season: Vegetation indices of the NDVI, SAVI, OSAVI, MSAVI, GNDVI, RVI, DVI, RGVI, IPVI and plastic cover indices PGI, RPGI, PI, PMLI were compared using Sentinel-2 satellite time series images.
 
Results and Discussion
Greenhouse cultivation is used to improve quality and increase food production. However, their development has many negative effects on the environment. Therefore, obtaining accurate and timely information on the distribution of greenhouses and the time of planting and harvesting crops under plastic covers can make a significant contribution to agricultural management, water management and soil protection. The present study is the first study to identify the length of the greenhouse cultivation period using Sentinel-2 satellite time series images. The results showed that among the object-oriented classification algorithms, two classification algorithms, Bayes and KNN, were more precise for the identification and determination of the cultivated area of greenhouses. The reflection of the plant below the plastic cover of the greenhouse in the NIR, Narrow NIR, Red Edge and SWIR bands increases by an equal amount in comparison with the reflection from the vegetation in the open space. Comparing vegetation cover and greenhouse cover indices showed that the indices designed based on SWIR and Red bands showed greater reflection during the hot season of the year. Indices based on NIR, Narrow NIR, and Red Edge bands were more reflective from October to late February. Based on the results obtained from the ground truth data, greenhouses are plastered during the warm season. This caused an increase in the reflectance in indices designed based on SWIR and Red bands and a decrease in reflectance in indices designed based on NIR, Narrow NIR, Red Edge bands, during the hot season. Therefore, combining all indices, two crop periods were observed: the first started in early March, peak cover was reached in April, and harvest continued. Until the middle of August. The second harvest started at the end of August and peaked in December, until the end of harvest in mid-February.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Aguilar, M. A., Vallario, A., Aguilar, F. J., Garcia Lorca, A., & Parente, C. (2015). Object-based greenhousehorticultural crop identification from multi-temporal satellite imagery: A case study in Almeria, Spain. Remote Sensing7(6), 7378-7401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70607378
  2. Arkhi, D., & Kalavi, S. (2019). Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented classification methods for land use mapping Using satellite image (Case Study: Ilam City). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement9(32), 1-16. DOI:22111/GAIJ.2019.4797 [In Persian]
  3. Briassoulis, D., Dougka, G., Dimakogianni, D., & Vayas, I. (2016). Analysis of the collapse of a greenhouse with vaulted roof. Biosystems Engineering, 151(11), 495-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.10.018
  4. Carvajal, F., Crisanto, E., Aguilar, F. J., Agüera, F., & Aguilar, M. A. (2006). Greenhouses detection using an artificial neural network with a very high-resolution satellite image. In ISPRS Technical Commission II Symposium, Vienna, 37-42.
  5. Chaofan, W., Jinsong, D., Ke, W., Ligang, M., & Tahmassebi, A. R. S. (2016). Object-based classification approach for greenhouse mapping using Landsat-8 imagery. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering9(1), 79-88. DOI: 3965/j.ijabe.20160901.1414
  6. Colby, J. D., & Keating, P. L. (1998). Land cover classification using Landsat TM imagery in the tropical highlands: the influence of anisotropic reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing19(8), 1479-1500. DOI:1080/014311698215306
  7. Crippen, R. E. (1990). Calculating the vegetation index faster. Remote sensing of Environment34(1), 71-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(90)90085-Z
  8. Espi, E., Salmeron, A., Fontecha, A., García, Y., & Real, A. I. (2006). PLastic films for agricultural applications. Plastic Film & Sheeting22(2), 85-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756087906064220
  9. Feizizadeh, B., & Helali, H. (2010). Comparison pixel-based, object-oriented methods and effective parameters in Classification Land cover/land use of west province Azerbaijan. Physical Geography Research Quarterly42(71). 73-84. [In Persian]
  10. Ghafari, S., Moradi, H. R., & Modarres, R. (2018). Comparison of object-oriented and pixel-based classification methods for land use mapping (Case study: Isfahan-Borkhar, Najafabad and Chadegan plains). RS and GIS for Natural Resources9(1), 40-57. [In Persian]
  11. Gitelson, A. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Stark, R., & Rundquist, D. (2002). Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction. Remote sensing of Environment80(1), 76-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00289-9
  12. Houborg, R., Anderson, M., & Daughtry, C. (2009). Utility of an image-based canopy reflectance modeling tool for remote estimation of LAI and leaf chlorophyll content at the field scale. Remote Sensing of Environment113(1), 259-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.014
  13. Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote sensing of environment25(3), 295-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X
  14. Jordan, C. F. (1969). Derivation of leaf‐area index from quality of light on the forest floor. Ecology50(4), 663-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936256
  15. Kittas, C., Katsoulas, N., Katsoupa, M., & Papaioannou, C. H. (2012). Test of a greenhouse covered by polyethylene film that reflects near-infrared radiation. In VII International Symposium on Light in Horticultural Systems, (956), 507-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.956.60
  16. Koc-San, D. (2013). Evaluation of different classification techniques for the detection of glass and plastic greenhouses from WorldView-2 satellite imagery. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing7(1), 073553-073553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.7.073553
  17. Kogan, F. (1993). United States droughts of late 1980's as seen by NOAA polar orbiting satellites. Proceedings of IGARSS'93-IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Tokyo, Japan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322522
  18. Levin, N., Lugassi, R., Ramon, U., Braun, O., & Ben‐Dor, E. (2007). Remote sensing as a tool for monitoring plasticulture in agricultural landscapes. International journal of remote sensing28(1), 183-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600658156
  19. Li, C., Chen, J., Wang, J., Han, P., Luan, Y., Ma, X., & Lu, A. (2016). Phthalate esters in soil, plastic film, and vegetable from greenhouse vegetable production bases in Beijing, China: concentrations, sources, and risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 568, 1037-1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.077
  20. Lu, L., Di, L., & Ye, Y. (2014). A decision-tree classifier for extracting transparent plastic-mulched landcover from Landsat-5 TM images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing7(11), 4548-4558. DOI:1109/JSTARS.2014.2327226
  21. Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, Y. H., & Sorooshian, S. (1994). A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote sensing of environment48(2), 119-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)90134-1
  22. Richardson, A. J., & Wiegand, C. L. (1977). Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing43(12), 1541-1552.
  23. Rondeaux, G., Steven, M., & Baret, F. (1996). Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Remote sensing of environment55(2), 95-107. DOI: 1016/0034-4257(95)00186-7
  24. Roostaei, S., Mokhtari, D., Kamran, V., & Khodaei Geshlag, L. (2019). Comparison of Pixel-based Algorithm (maximum liklihood) and Object-based Method (Support Vector Machine) in Classification of Land Use (Ahar-Varzeghan Area). Quantitative Geomorphological Research8(1), 118-129. [In Persian]
  25. Shi, L., Huang, X., Zhong, T., & Taubenböck, H. (2020). Mapping plastic greenhouses using spectral metrics derived from GaoFen-2 satellite data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing13, 49-59. DOI:1109/JSTARS.2019.2950466
  26. Shirani, F., Mazidi, A., & Khodagholi, M. (2009). Regionalization of Climate in Yazd Province Using Multivariate Statistical Methods. Journal of Geography and Regional Development7(13), 140-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v7i13.8980 [In Persian]
  27. Sun, H., Wang, L., Lin, R., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, B. (2021). Mapping plastic greenhouses with two-temporal sentinel-2 images and 1d-cnn deep learning. Remote Sensing13(14), 2820. DOI:3390/rs13142820
  28. The European Space Agency. (2022). Sentinel-2 mission guide. Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://sentinels.copernicus.eu/web/sentinel/missions/sentinel-2
  29. Tarantino, E., & Figorito, B. (2012). Mapping rural areas with widespread plastic covered vineyards using true color aerial data. Remote Sensing4(7), 1913-1928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4071913
  30. Themistocleous, K., Papoutsa, C., Michaelides, S., & Hadjimitsis, D. (2020). Investigating detection of floating plastic litter from space using sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sensing, 12(16), 2648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162648
  31. Wang, J., Chen, G., Christie, P., Zhang, M., Luo, Y., & Teng, Y. (2015). Occurrence and risk assessment of phthalate esters (PAEs) in vegetables and soils of suburban plastic film greenhouses. Science of the Total Environment523, 129-137. DOI:1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.101
  32. Yang, D., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., Chen, X., Chen, X., & Cao, X. (2017). Mapping plastic greenhouse with medium spatial resolution satellite data: Development of a new spectral index. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing128(6), 47-60. DOI: 1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.03.002