Analysis of Desertification Potential of Yazd Province Using DVI Indicators

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph. D of Geomorphologhy, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Master of Geomorphology, Payam Noor University, Sanandaj branch, Sanandaj, Iran.

3 Ph. D Student of Geomorphologhy, Ferdosi University, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Ph. D student in geomorphology, University of Kharazmi, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
One of the environmental challenges in the world is desertification. Desertification is land degradation in arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid caused by several factors such as climate change and human activities. Desertification is a significant phenomenon, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. In many instances, it is seen as a serious threat to human societies. The desertification process in developing countries is very intense, and this issue can have a significant impact on the future of these countries. Iran is a country that is exposed to the phenomenon of desertification. Due to the geographical location, arid and semi-arid areas cover approximately two-thirds of Iran.  The desertification phenomenon is present in Yazd province. Due to its climate and hydrogeomorphology, this province, which is located in the central regions of Iran, has a high vulnerability potential against land use changes and desertification. Considering the importance of the topic, this research has identified the vulnerable areas of Yazd province against desertification using the DVI index.
 
Material and Methods
In this research, library information, statistical data related to the population of Yazd province, climatic data of Yazd province, as well as the 30-meter SRTM DEM as the most important research data were used. The model used in this research was based on DVI vulnerability index. The DVI vulnerability index was the basis for the model used in this research. The time-spatial changes of vulnerability to desertification in the Banas River basin in India have been investigated using the DVI model. The DVI model uses 9 indicators, which are grouped into 4 groups: demographic indicators, weather indicators, topographic indicators, and soil indicators.
 
Results and Discussion
In this research, in order to identify the vulnerable areas of Yazd province to desertification from demographic indicators (population density, population growth and illiteracy percentage), weather indicators (precipitation rate, average temperature, and evaporation rate and dryness index), topographic indices (slope percentage) and soil science indices (soil type) have been used.
 
The slope index indicates that the western parts of Yazd province are more vulnerable. According to the geological index, the northern and eastern parts of this province are highly vulnerable. The northern, central, and eastern regions of Yazd province are highly vulnerable in terms of precipitation, average temperature, evaporation, and dryness indicators. Yazd city has a high vulnerability potential in terms of population density index. In terms of population growth index, Ardakan city has a high vulnerability potential and also in terms of illiteracy index, Taft city has a high vulnerability potential. The location of Yazd province has resulted in a large portion of its area being covered in arid and hyper-arid areas. Due to their high vulnerability to erosion, destruction, and vulnerability, many parts of this province are prone to desertification. The DVI model was used to evaluate the vulnerability potential of Yazd province against desertification in this research. The DVI model results are divided into 4 vulnerability potential classes: low, medium, high, and very high. The results indicate that the class with a high vulnerability potential covers 42.9% of the area, which is primarily concentrated in the northern and central areas of Yazd province. The class with high vulnerability potential covers 41/4 of the area, which primarily encompasses the western regions of Yazd province. The classes with medium and low vulnerability potential are distributed in the central, southeastern, and southern parts of Yazd province, with 14.3 and 1.4 percent of the area, respectively. The vulnerability status of cities in Yazd province has been assessed in this research. Khatam and Bahabad cities have the lowest vulnerability percentage, while Yazd, Meibod, and Ardakan cities have the highest vulnerability potential, according to the results. Many parts of Yazd province, including its northern and central regions, have a high vulnerability potential, which requires special attention and the implementation of long-term programs to prevent vulnerability and increase desertification.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Baraka, K., Chandra, M., Sekaran, D., & Barak, K. (2012). Sensitivity of land to desertification and environmental sensitivity indices in agricultural ecosystems (1984 and 2008) in the region of Boustan, Ecological Economics, 1, 834-837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.03.012
  2. Capozzi, F., Di Palma, A., De Paola, F., Giugni, M., Iavazzo, P., Topa, M. E., & Giordano, S. (2018). Assessing desertification in sub-Saharan peri-urban areas: case study applications in Burkina Faso and Senegal. Geochemical Exploration, 190, 281-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.03.012
  3. Feng, Q., Ma, H., Jiang, X.M., Wang, X., & Cao, S.X. (2015). What Has Caused Desertification in China? Scientific Reports, 5, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15998
  4. Flores, E. S., & Yool, S. R. (2007). Sensitivity of change vector analysis to land cover change in an arid ecosystem. Remote Sensing, 28(5), 1069–1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600868482
  5. Honardoust, F., Ownegh, M., & Sheikh, V. (2011). Assessing desertification sensitivity in the northern part of Gorgan Plain, southeast of the Caspian Sea, Iran. Environmental Sciences, 5(3), 205-220. DOI: https://doi.org/3923/rjes.2011.205.220 [In Persian]
  6. Iran Statistics Center. (2016). Demographic information of Yazd province.https://www.amar.org.ir [In Persian]
  7. John, R., Chen, J.Q., Lu, N., & Wilske, B. (2009). Land cover/land use change in semi-arid Inner Mongolia: 1992–2004. Environmental Research Letters, 4, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/1088/1748-9326/4/4/045010
  8. Kalyan, S., Sharma, D., & Sharma, A. (2021). Spatio-temporal variation in desert vulnerability using desertification index over the Banas River Basin in Rajasthan, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/1007/s12517-020-06417-0
  9. Kazeminia, A., Rangzan, K., & Mahmoud Abadi, M. (2017). Assessment of Desertification using the MEDALUS model (Case study: the lands of west Ahvaz). RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 8(2), 111-126. [In Persian]
  10. Lamchin, M., Lee, W.K., Jeon, S.W., Lee, J.Y., Song, C., & Piao, D. (2017). Correlation between desertification and environmental variables using remote sensing techniques in Hogno Khaan, Mongolia. Sustainability, 9, 519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040581
  11. Ma, Z., Xie, Y., Jiao, J., Li, L., & Wang, X. (2011). The construction and application of an Aledo-NDVI based desertification monitoring model. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10(C), 2029–2035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.318
  12. Maghsoudi, M., & Pireh M. (2022). Identifying Vulnerable Areas to Desertification using the DVI Index (Case study: Kerman province). Environmental Erosion, 12 (3), 1-17. [In Persian]
  13. Mombeni, M., Karamshahi, A., Azadnia, F., Garaee, P., & Karimi, K. (2016). Assessment of desertification intensity using IMDPA method (Case study: Dashte Abbas, Ilam). RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 7(3), 100-112. [In Persian]
  14. Nadi, M., Kalantari, S., Khavaninzadeh, A., & Tazeh, M. (2022). Evaluation of desertification situation in Tabas city based on technogenic desertification indicators using satellite images. Ecosystem Management, 2(2), 34-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/emj.2022.254751 [In Persian]
  15. Salehi, A., & Karasi, P. (2021). The role of man-made factors in desertification east of Isfahan. Spatial Planning, 11(3), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2021.126373.1546 [In Persian]
  16. Shirghir, S., & Masoudi, M. (2021). Hazard Assessment of Desertification Using the New Model of Proposed MEDALUS. Watershed Research, 2(34), 133-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/wmej.2021.352966 [In Persian]
  17. Tavares, J.D.P., Baptista, I., Ferreira, A.J., Amiotte-Suchet, P., Coelho, C., Gomes, S., & Varela, L. (2015). Assessment and mapping the sensitive areas to desertification in an insular Sahelian mountain region Case study of the Ribeira Seca Watershed, Santiago Island, Cabo Verde. Catena, 128, 214-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.005
  18. Vorovencii, L. (2017). Applying the change vector analysis technique to assess the desertification risk in the south-west of Romania in the period 1984–2011. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189 (10). 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/1007/s10661-017-6234-6
  19. Wang, X., Hua, T., Lang, L., & Ma, W. (2017). Spatial differences of aeolian desertification responses to climate in arid Asia. Global and Planetary Change, 148, 22-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.11.008
  20. Zolfaghari, F., & Khosravi, H. (2016). Assessment of Desertification Severity Using IMDPA Model in Saravan Region. Geography and Environmental Planning, 2(27), 87-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2016.21817 [In Persian]
Desert Management
Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 26
6 Article
September 2023
Pages 35-48

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 May 2023
  • Revise Date: 08 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 16 August 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics